...
Cfm tabs page | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||
Step 2: Determining Who Will Conduct the ReviewThis “step” is more of a series of related checks to help determine both 1) Who will conduct the review, and 2) Which procedures will apply to the review, based on the faculty member’s university appointment(s).
A. Who Will Oversee Review:A closer look at the “Who” of the review will help determine the “How” of the review. In general, CPRs will be conducted within a faculty member’s department and involve the department chair. Beginning in 24-25, the CPR will route from the department to the dean’s level for review and final ratings. However, there are two other factors that would vary review procedures: Admin roles and joint faculty appointments. Section 1: Admin or Not AdminAt different points along the process, the procedures differ depending whether or not the reviewee holds, or has held, an administrative appointment for at least one academic year during the period of CPR evaluation. (See Definitions) Some examples of how this could play out, based on the Guidelines:
These are just a few examples, but essentially, you’ll want to check the reviewee’s appointments (faculty jobs in WD) during the review period for the CPR and make sure to identify any Admin roles; i.e., A&P positions held, though not including “Faculty Associate” or “Program Director (Academic).” (See Definitions)
If any of your department’s faculty qualifies as an Admin or Former Admin, you will want to identify the Admin Supervisor for the appointment(s).
To sum up:
a. The Guidelines explain what to do if the Admin Supervisor has changed since the Admin appointment. (see 5.b.2.ii.) |
Cfm tabs page | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||
...