Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Randomized Sample Selection:
    A subset equivalent to 20% of the total transcription samples will be randomly selected for reliability testing. This selection will be project-specific , with examples including (for example DrSantos_Spa_WABs_FTLD_2024 or , Kesha_nfvPPA_lvPPA_2024.)

  2. Initial Comparison for Reliability:
    The selected samples will be assessed for transcription accuracy using the CLAN software. Two key metrics will be evaluated:

    • Percentage of Utterances with Matching Codes: Calculated as the proportion of all utterances where the assigned codes match perfectly between transcribers.

    • Percentage of Words with Matching Codes: Calculated as the proportion of individual words with identical coding across transcriptions.

  3. Discrepancy Resolution:
    If 100% agreement is not achieved:

    • A meeting will be scheduled between the involved transcribers to review discrepancies.

    • Consensus will be reached on the appropriate transcription for all disputed elements.

  4. Finalization of Reliable Transcriptions:
    Following the consensus meeting:

    • Edits will be made to the coded transcriptions based on agreed-upon revisions.

    • The transcription will then be considered finalized for reliability.

  5. Documentation of Process:
    All reliability calculations and consensus resolutions will be documented in the Connected Speech Reliability Smartsheet Reports for project records, contributing to transparency and repeatability in the transcription process.

...