Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Accelerated cases must be fully explained and justified by the dean and chair (if applicable) and should only be put forward for review when a compelling case can be made because

  • the candidate’s record is truly exceptional across all areas of contribution (Section A.6), the noted below)
    • teaching courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels,
    • research, creative activities, and other scholarly efforts,
    • mentoring activities, including formal and informal supervision of students and other mentees,
    • administrative and committee service to the department, college, and University, and professional public
      service to the nation, state, and society, and
    • other evidence of merit or recognition, such as awards, fellowships, and grants,
  • the candidate exceeds expectations for on-time promotion in all areas [Subsection C.2(c)], and that (described below), and
    • impact, distinction, and continuing potential in research, scholarship, and/or creative endeavors; teaching; mentoring; service to the University and professional public service; and external recognition of accomplishments
    • a strong and reliable record of excellence in research, scholarship, and/or creative endeavors that predicts a continuing trajectory of impactful contributions throughout an extended career at UT Austin, and
    • research funding, in accordance with discipline norms, that predicts a sustainable trajectory of continued research excellence and financial support for students supervised by the candidate

NOTE:  the standards, workload demands, and expectations are higher for the promotion to tenured full professor and include expectations about demonstrated leadership

  • accelerated promotion is in the University’s best interest.

...