...
- A summary of the discussion within the CAC, including an explanation of the rationale for the committee’s vote and an explanation of negative votes. The dean should solicit feedback from the committee regarding the reasons for negative votes (if any) and to characterize the overall strength of the CAC’s recommendations and any areas of concern.
...
Explain the timing of the promotion review (e.g., mandatory review, accelerated review, or candidate invoked right of consideration) and provide justification for an accelerated review [Subsection B.3(b) - Associate Professor or C.3(b) - Full Professor] or promotion after an extended time in rank (Section C.5).
Independent assessment of the candidate’s strengths and weaknesses in each of the areas below- Teaching courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels
- Research, creative activities, and other scholarly efforts
- Mentoring activities, including formal and informal supervision of students and other mentees
- Administrative and committee service to the department, college, and University, and professional public
service to the nation, state, and society - Other evidence of merit or recognition, such as awards, fellowships, and grants
...