Add something about spatial error filtering
With version 2 of the website, we redesigned the checklists at the state, county, major basin, and HUC8 levels. Before this recent revision, checklists included all species, even when their occurrences in the area of interest were based on what we suspected might be erroneous records. That was done because we felt strongly about providing users all of the available data, even when we might be dubious about some of the records. Our new design continues to provide all of the data, so our checklists can still be considered the most complete list based on total specimen evidence, but we now indicate (via rose-colored highlight) which species we believe to be possibly erroneous, thus allowing users to easily exclude them from their workflows as appropriate. The new checklists also include statistics (N occurrence records that we examined and that we deem to be likely erroneous) to better communicate the full justification (or relative lack thereof) for inclusion of each species on the list. Users can use these data to make their own decisions about what species should be included in the checklist. Checklists for hydrological units now include labels indicating which species are non-native. These determinations are algorithmically derived “on the fly” based on whether or not an occurrence falls within the nativity layers that we created for each species. Future updates to our nativity layers will thus automatically be accounted for in these checklists.
...