-Future: In the future it would be nice to add motor control , or a better to the design, along with an improved handle for better actuation -Conclude: by the user.
However, the project met initial requirements of motion for point P. Matches the graphs in the kinematic analysis however, the model is not actuated by a motor with a constant velocity so the mechanism did not have the same smooth motion as in the kinematic analysis animation. Though this is expected with the jerkiness of the input link the requirements set forth in the introduction proposal. The mechanism accurately and successfully followed the pathing predicted early in the project and can easily fit and be held in someone's hand. The limitations to this project include the lack of motor control, this means the smoothness of the mechanism's motion is dictated by the user who can very rarely ensure a smooth consistent input velocity. In the future it would be nice to add motor control to the design, along with an improved handle for better actuation by the user.