Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

The intial CAD for this project was borrowed fromĀ 













Table 1: Link Lengths

Figure 1: Initial CAD Borrowed from Research Paper and Altered

...

Figure 2: Prototype No. 1 - Failed due to lack of link thickness tolerancingImage RemovedImage RemovedImage Removed

This design looked impressive, but it had several problems. First, it had a limited range of motion. As the mechanism is mirrored on both sides for stability, there needs to be a long bolt that crosses through joint __ . This ended up interfering with the motion of the finger by blocking the four-bar from extending further once it hit the bolt. This resulted in a limited range of motion and a high flexion distance from the finger to the palm, which would mean we could only really hold large objects. Another problem we faced was the difficulty of assembly, which took at least an hour and a half because of all the small bolts and the lack of tolerancing on the 3D-printed holes. Finally, the hole sizes were not uniform which led to there being a bit of play.

Image AddedImage AddedImage Added

Figure 3: Prototype No. 2 - Failed due to lack of ROM of end-effector

Image Removed

Figure 4: Initial Design 2, simplified linkages

Image RemovedImage RemovedImage Removed

Figure 5: Prototype No. 3 - Updated prototype with simpler linkage design, higher ROMWe decided that this design did not meet our needs, and went back to the drawing board. We decided to simplify the design to make manufacturing and assembly easier and also to remove the bolt at joint __ to increase uor range of motion. This process was quick since we simply followed the same 3D sketch as the original and made extrudes in the assembly to get a skeleton of fundamentally the same linkage.

Image Added

This prototype had several benefits over the previous one. First, it was better toleranced and assembled more easily since we standardized all the bolt sizes to M3. Secondly, it had a greater range of motion due to the lack of a bolt going across the middle connecting Link 2 to Link 4, which was previously hitting the mechanism and stopping it. Finally, it was overall simpler to manufacture and assembly. Going forward, this is the basic design we will be using for ourĀ 

Figure 4: Initial Design 2, simplified linkages

Image AddedImage AddedImage Added

Figure 5: Prototype No. 3 - Updated prototype with simpler linkage design, higher ROM

The next steps for our project will be to figure out how we will incorporate multiple of these fingers into a hand.

















Arduino Nano

Table 2: Projected Bill of Materials for Final Project