Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Feature Category

Criterion

AtoMArchivesSpace
MetaOpen SourceYesYes
User Support

Yes- user base in google groups:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ica-atom-users

Membership allows access to technical support.
Training & consultation

It doesn't offer training, but it allows consultations via e-mail or

google groups

Yes, with membership

http://www.archivesspace.org/trainingconsultations

Technical documentation Membership allows access to technical support.
System Requirements  
Backup/ restore utility  
Hosting Available?Yes, with fee

Yes, by Lyrasis, with fee:

http://www.lyrasis.org/LYRASIS%20Digital/Pages/ArchivesSpace.aspx

Demo/ Sandbox Available?http://demo.accesstomemory.org/

http://www.archivesspace.org/sandbox

Migration support?Yes, with fee

Membership provides migration tools from AT and Archon. Does membership would also support other migration sources?

http://www.archivesspace.org/migrations

Importing/ Exporting MetadataExports MARCNo. Possible future release, but nothing official.Yes (MARC xml). Bugs reported that need to be fixed.
Exports EADYes. Bugs identified when tested, also will have to be customized to our TARO EAD templateYes. Bugs reported that need to be fixed. Also, it will  need to be customized to our TARO EAD template
Exports Dublin CoreProvides the functionality (not tested)No
Exports MODSIf the administrator has set the default archival description template to MODS, this will also appear as an export option (not tested)No
Exports METSNoShort-term development target: Extend METS exports to include file, rights, and event metadata
Exports MADSNoNo
Exports EACYes (not tested)Yes (not tested)
Exports SKOSFrom the subjects and places modules (not tested)No
Batch Exports EADNo documentation foundNo documentation found
Batch Exports MARCNoNo documentation found
Batch Export Tab Delimited FilesNo documentation foundNo documentation found
Imports EADYes. Tested and there isn't a one to one match between our EAD template and AtoM fields. Would need to be customized

Yes, but bugs reported that need to be fixed.

EAD import/export map: http://www.archivesspace.org/importexport

Imports MARCNo

Yes (not tested)

MARCXML import/export map: http://www.archivesspace.org/importexport

Imports Tab Delimited Files/ CSVYes. AtoM provides a csv template for the import, but didn't work correctly when testedYes (not tested)
Imports Digital Image FilesYes; Digital Objects get embeded on the hyerarchical structure; formats supported: https://www.accesstomemory.org/en/docs/2.1/user-manual/import-export/upload-digital-object/#file-formats

Yes (not tested)

Digital Object CSV map and template: http://www.archivesspace.org/importexport

Import Accession DataYes. AtoM provides a csv template for the import, but didn't work correctly when tested

Yes, CSV only. Short-term development target: Create XML import for accession data

Accession CSV map and template: http://www.archivesspace.org/importexport

Batch Import EADYes (not tested)Yes (not tested)
Batch Import MARCNoNo documentation found
Batch Import CSVYes (not tested)Yes (not tested)
Collection ManagementAppraisals  
AccessionsManaged on their own moduleManaged on their own module
Create Deeds of GiftNo documentation foundNo documentation found
Prioritize Processing OrderYes, and also indicate the processing statusYes, and also indicate the processing status
Track DonorsDonors are managed on their own moduleNo documentation found
Project Management

Some fields for project management on Accessions module

Looks like it can be done from the Accessions module and the Resource module
Record ConditionNo specific areaOn the accessions module
Manage LocationsPhysical storage managed on its own moduleYale is developing new features on the locations module, will have to see if it meets our needs
Manage Restricted MaterialsNo documentation foundRestricted material is marked, and it allows to narrow search
Manage RightsRight holders are managed on its own moduleYes
Manage Loans & ExhibitsNo documentation foundYes, from the locations module
SeparationsFrom the Archival Descriptions and the accession record 
DestructionsFrom the Archival Descriptions and the accession record 
De-AccessioningA de-accession can be done directly from the accession recordFrom the Archival Descriptions and the accession record
Reference SupportNo documentation foundNo documentation found
Generate ReportsReports for file lists, item lists, physical storage locations and box labels

Short term development target: Implement a reporting module that will enable archivists to modify and save default reports, to create new reports, and to share reports

Define many default reports, including some replicating and updating reports in the Archivists’ Toolkit and new reports for new modules and functions in ArchivesSpace

Track Repository StatisticsNo documentation foundNo documentation found
Resource DescriptionTARO and OCLC ID#Yes. Supports multiple unit ID's. 
Authority ControlAuthorities managed on their own module EAC-CPFAuthorities managed on their own module EAC-CPF
Controlled vocabularySubjects and Places managed on their own moduleSubjects (including places) managed on their own module
Compliance to Archival StandardsICA standards, DACS, RAD, Dublin Core, MODS 
Data Validation  
Templating / Default FieldsYesYes
Support for Digital Media  
InternationalizationMultilingual optionsMultilingual?
Flexibility of Data ModelYesYes
Item-level DescriptionYesYes
Reorganize HierarchiesYes. Needs to be done directly from the item level Yes
Dynamically generate EAD finding aids  
Publish finding aids onlineYes, with public interface.Yes, with public interface.
TARO EAD preview or internal validationNo. Would still require Oxygen for preview. Can export unpublished finding aids as pdf from sandbox, though since it doesn't have the TARO style sheet it looks different from a TARO preview.
Administrative FunctionsUser Permissions  
Support for Harvesting/ Syndication  
Customization / Configuration  
Spell Check  
Bug Reporting  
Interoperability with Digital Repository Systems  
Multi-repository support?Yes and no. Some limited functionality.Yes (not tested)
User InterfaceWeb Publishing  
BrowseArchival Descriptions, Authorities, Archival Institutions, subjects, places, digital objects and functionsAccessions, Resources, Digital Objects, Subjects, Agents, Locations, Events, Collection, Clasification
SearchGobal or by repositoryYes
Advanced SearchYesYes
CustomizableYes. In-house or supported with feeYes. In-house or supported with fee (only members)
Built-in HelpPop up notes referring to DACS rules; should be customizable to in-house interpretation of the rulesYes. With membership; also, pop up notes referring to DACS rules; should be customizable to in-house interpretation of the rules
Link to Images & Other FilesYes 
Easy Data EntryInterface somewhat clunky for data entry.Data entry is kind of similar to AtoM. Rapid data entry option does alleviate somewhat.
Repositories we have contacted 
  • WorldBank
  • Dumbarton Oaks
  • New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Center

Google hangout session: 2014-10-29 Meeting notes ADWG