Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Status
colourGreen
titleInital Design
Status
colourYellow
titleDraft
Status
colourRed
titleCompleted Draft
Status
colourRed
titleRound One Feedback
Status
colourRed
titleRound Two Feedback
Status
colourRed
titlePublication and Sharing
Status
colourRed
titleReview Implementation

Status: Draft decision trees created April 2024, will be discussed by committee spring 2024.

...

Status
colourGreen
titleINITIAL Outline
Status
colourYellowRed
titleDraft Recommendations
Status
colourRed
titleCompleted Draft
Status
colourRed
titleRound unsafe-One Feedback
Status
colourRed
titleTest Implementation
Status
colourRed
titleRound Two Feedback
Status
colourRed
titlePublication and Implementation

Status: Outlined April 2024, will be developed after completion of decision tree.

...

Status
colourGreen
titleINITIAL Outline
Status
colourYellowRed
titleDraft Recommendations
Status
colourRed
titleCompleted Draft
Status
colourRed
titleRound unsafe-One Feedback
Status
colourRed
titleTest Implementation
Status
colourRed
titleRound Two Feedback
Status
colourRed
titlePublication and Implementation

Status: Outlined April 2024, will be developed after completion of decision tree.

...

Major goals include increasing the number of non-MARC metadata projects for Content Management, increasing non-MARC metadata training for various partners, developing strategies to ensure metadata creation/delivery lines up with Stewardship workflows, and visualizing how non-MARC and MARC metadata systems and workflows intersect with each other. The latter is especially pertinent as Primo is developed into an aggregation platform.

Status
colourGreen
titleINITIAL Outline
Status
colourGreen
titleinformational interviews
Status
colourGreen
titledata refinement
Status
colourGreen
titledata analysis
Status
colourGreen
titledata visualizations
Status
colourGreen
titledraft report
Status
colourGreen
titlefeedback
Status
colourGreen
titlefinal report
Status
colourYellow
titlePublication and Implementation

Status: report completed March 2024, three major recommendations derived from scan April 2024. See the report and related findings here.

...

Critical metadata can be considered as a subset of the above topic. Similar to the NDSA’s levels of preservation, developing a set of evaluative levels of creating critical metadata can be a starting point to evaluate what current practice is across UT Libraries. (Can be used as a tool by repositories/members to identify where they are and where they’d like to move to.) This helps provide standard policy that repositories can fall back on, but not mandate prescriptive terminology that can be counterintuitive to description or post-custodial workflows.

Status
colourGreen
titleINITIAL Outline
Status
colourGreen
titlesurvey collection
Status
colourGreen
titledata refinement
Status
colourGreen
titledata analysis
Status
colourGreen
titledata visualizations
Status
colourGreen
titledraft report
Status
colourGreen
titlefeedback
Status
colourYellow
titlefinal report
Status
colourRed
titlePublication and Implementation

Status: draft report completed April 2024. Being reviewed by group and UTL administration spring 2024.