...
Major goals include reducing confusion or hesitancy from stakeholders when ingesting and publishing digital assets, reducing unnecessary duplication of assets in sites, and simplifying and identifying sites that stakeholders can consistently use for metadata reuse.
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | Inital Design |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | Completed Draft |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Yellow |
---|
title | Round One Feedback |
---|
|
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Round Two Feedback |
---|
|
Status |
---|
colour | title | Decision Trees STATUSRed |
---|
title | Publication and Sharing |
---|
|
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Review Implementation |
---|
|
Status: Draft decision trees created April 2024, will be discussed by committee spring -August 2024; sent to stakeholders for review in late August 2024.
Practical metadata reuse recommendations
Major goals include enhancing existing metadata reuse workflows and identifying/creating new ones to address ingest backlogs/staffing shortages.
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | INITIAL Outline |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Draft Recommendations |
---|
|
Yellow | title | Metadata Reuse Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Round unsafe-One Feedback |
---|
|
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Test Implementation |
---|
|
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Round Two Feedback |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Publication and Implementation |
---|
|
Status: Outlined April 2024, will be developed after completion of decision tree.
...
Major goals facilitating better metadata reuse across sites, including local authorities/vocabularies.
Yellow | title | Metadata StorageGreen | title | INITIAL Outline |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Draft Recommendations |
---|
|
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Completed Draft |
---|
|
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Round unsafe-One Feedback |
---|
|
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Test Implementation |
---|
|
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Round Two Feedback |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Publication and Implementation |
---|
|
Status: Outlined April 2024, will be developed after completion of decision tree.
...
Major goals include increasing the number of non-MARC metadata projects for Content Management, increasing non-MARC metadata training for various partners, developing strategies to ensure metadata creation/delivery lines up with Stewardship workflows, and visualizing how non-MARC and MARC metadata systems and workflows intersect with each other. The latter is especially pertinent as Primo is developed into an aggregation platform.
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | INITIAL Outline |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | informational interviews |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | data refinement |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | data analysis |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | data visualizations |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | draft report |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | final report |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | Publication and Implementation |
---|
|
Status: report completed March 2024, three major recommendations derived from scan April 2024. See the report and related findings here.
...
Critical metadata can be considered as a subset of the above topic. Similar to the NDSA’s levels of preservation, developing a set of evaluative levels of creating critical metadata can be a starting point to evaluate what current practice is across UT Libraries. (Can be used as a tool by repositories/members to identify where they are and where they’d like to move to.) This helps provide standard policy that repositories can fall back on, but not mandate prescriptive terminology that can be counterintuitive to description or post-custodial workflows.
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | INITIAL Outline |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | survey collection |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | data refinement |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | data analysis |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | data visualizations |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | draft report |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | final report |
---|
|
Status |
---|
| |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | Publication and Implementation |
---|
|
Status: draft report completed April 2024. Being reviewed by group and UTL administration spring 2024. See the report and related findings here.