...
| Dublin Core field | Mapping condition | MODS element | Notes |
|---|
| dc:date |
| dateCreated[@point="start"] | The date value in the MODS element is prefixed with the text "Created: ". |
| dc:date |
| dateCreated[@point="end"] | Creation start and end date are concatenated, separated by "/". The resulting string is prefixed with the text "Created: ". |
| dc:date |
| dateIssued[@point="start"] | The date value in the MODS element is prefixed with the text "Issued: ". |
| dc:date |
| dateIssued[@point="end"] | Creation start and end date are concatenated, separated by "/". The resulting string is prefixed with the text "Issued: ". |
| N/A |
| copyrightDate | Currently, there is no mapping of copyrightDate to DC implemented in the DAMS. |
MARC 21
| Multiexcerpt |
|---|
| MultiExcerptName | marc-date |
|---|
|
see http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-mapping.html#publication. The following specific guidelines apply for the DAMS: | MARC 21 field | Mapping condition | MODS element | Notes |
|---|
| * |
| *[@encoding] | Only use encoding="w3cdtf" or do not use the encoding attribute at all. | | 260$g |
| dateCreated | The MODS field dateOther is not implemented in the DAMS. Map MARC field 260$g to dateCreated instead. | | 264$c | MARC indicator 2 has values 0, 3 | dateCreated | The MODS field dateOther is not implemented in the DAMS. Map MARC field 264$c to dateCreated instead. | 264$c | MARC indicator 2 has value 2 | dateIssued | The MODS field dateOther is not implemented in the DAMS. Map MARC field 264$c to dateIssued instead. | | 033 |
| note[@type="date captured"] | The MODS field dateCaptured is not implemented in the DAMS. Map MARC field 033 to a note element with type "date captured" instead. | 046$m |
| N/A | The MODS field dateValid is not implemented in the DAMS. | | 046$n |
| N/A | The MODS field dateValid is not implemented in the DAMS. | | 046$j |
| N/A | The MODS field dateModified is not implemented in the DAMS. | | 534$c |
| dateCreated/ dateIssued | MARC field 534 describes an original version, i.e. likely a different Expression/ Manifestation than what is described by the main bibliographic fields in the same record. Consider using a MARC record describing the same Expression/ Manifestation of a work that is digitized and ingested in the DAMS. Check textual statement in MARC subfield 534$c carefully to determine whether to map to dateCreated or dateIssued. | | 775$d |
| dateCreated/ dateIssued | MARC field 775 describes another available edition, i.e. likely a different Expression/ Manifestation than what is described by the main bibliographic fields in the same record. Consider using a MARC record describing the same Expression/ Manifestation of a work that is digitized and ingested in the DAMS. Check textual statement in MARC subfield 775$d carefully to determine whether to map to dateCreated or dateIssued. | | 776$d |
| dateCreated/ dateIssued | MARC field 776 describes another available physical form, i.e. likely a different Manifestation than what is described by the main bibliographic fields in the same record. Consider using a MARC record describing the same Manifestation of a work that is digitized and ingested in the DAMS. Check textual statement in MARC subfield 776$d carefully to determine whether to map to dateCreated or dateIssued. |
|
Solr
In general, all MODS metadata is imported into the DAMS Solr server upon ingest. The ingest process generates Solr fields typically named according to the following schema:
...