EDP Peer Teaching Template

Purpose of Peer Teaching Observations

There are many benefits to conducting routine peer teaching observations, including:

To provide continual feedback and give instructors an opportunity to consider, modify, and reexamine their teaching with the support of their colleagues.
Peer review of teaching can be used to evaluate and assess as part of a formal reward system used in merit, promotion, and tenure decisions.

Frequency of Peer Teaching Observations

Faculty at the Assistant and Associate ranks (including non-tenure track faculty) should be reviewed in their 2^ndand 5^thyears in rank. At the Full Professor rank (or equivalent non-tenure track rank), a peer teaching observation should occur during the 5^thyear of each 6-year post-tenure cycle.

Composition of Peer Teaching Observation Committee(s)

Peer teaching observation assignments will be determined by the Department Chair, in conjunction with the Faculty Annual Review Committee. Each faculty member under review will be given the opportunity to “veto” one of the recommended peer reviewers.

Overview of the Peer Teaching Observation Process

Each peer teaching observation consists of four steps:

Step 1: Pre-Observation. Pre-observation is a two-part process consisting of 1) closely examining the course materials an instructor has organized to support student learning, and 2) engaging in purposeful conversation with the instructor (a pre-observation interview) about class expectations and context; these will provide the necessary background for the observation.

Step 2: Observations. A focused and purposeful inquiry into observable individual and group behaviors in a specific class to help both instructor and observer “see” teaching and learning from a different perspective. More than one peer observation is expected. EDP expects multiple observations across multiple courses (at different levels), if possible. If the faculty member is only teaching one course during the year due to substantial buyout/administrative responsibilities, that course should be observed multiple times. Each reviewer should attend 2-3 class sessions to observe individual and group behaviors in a specific class, as well as to gain a thorough understanding of the instructor’s interactions with the class.

Step 3: Post-Observation. The post-observation is a follow-up meeting between the observer(s) and instructor to bring impressions from the materials’ review and observation together in a mutual conversation about teaching and learning.

Step 4: Peer Teaching Observation Report – A written report of the faculty member’s teaching should be drafted, including comments on what the instructor does well and suggested areas for improvement. A list of observations conducted (with course, observer, and date) should also be included.

Components of a Peer Teaching Observation Report

Once the four steps listed above are completed, the peer observation committee is responsible for writing up a comprehensive assessment of their peer teaching review. These reports should cover the instructor’s presentation, course content, organization, clarity of written materials, rigor and fairness of written examinations, appropriateness of methodology, and student outcomes. In order to ensure that these peer teaching observations can be used for our University’s promotion process, they must include the following information:

Each peer observation report must be written by the faculty peer observer and is to include:

Number and title of observed course(s)
Date of report(s)
Date of classroom observation(s)
Description of methods by which instructor engages students in learning
Date on which the observation(s) was discussed with the candidate
Constructive advice
Candidate’s responsiveness and any specific improvement(s) linked to previous peer observation reports
Name and signature of observer(s)
Review of course instructor survey ratings and student comments for courses taught while in rank
Assessment of candidate’s contributions and trajectory in terms of formal and informal student supervision and advising

A copy of the Peer Teaching Observation reports should be delivered to the faculty member being reviewed, the Department Chair & the Executive Assistant.

Additional Peer Teaching Resources:

Faculty Innovation Info on Peer Observations

Faculty Evaluation Policies

Browser not supported