Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

ItemWhoNotes
Intro to Study Hall formatMelanie
HousekeepingMelanie
  • The Outlook invite for the meeting was suggested as a way to get organized - was it useful?
    • the majority of attendees did find it helpful
  • Next month is the last meeting of the semester - 
    • Do we want to do anything special for that meeting?
    • Do we have any special goals for that meeting? 
    • Things we want to shore up or have ready for January?
Recap on digital scholarshipMelanie/Jennifer
  • There have been 2 campus-wide gatherings
  • They pulled together representatives from groups inside the libraries doing related work
  • The TX DH Consortium is working on fleshing out their website - the area where you can make a profile with projects and special interests so that people can find each other and connect
  • Next TX DH Consortium will be in Arlington in April
  • UT-wide meetings have been informal - conversation, getting people subscribed to the UT-DH listserv
    • a couple of projects have already come out of that - possible grant proposals
    • the meetings have been advertised on campus but have also pulled in some folks from outside of campus
  • The TX DH consortium list would be a good place to push the interinstitutional conversation around DH
  • Last session there was a discussion about combining DP questions in the DH survey with Jennifer and Ece
    • They surveyed the UTLib group about the survey and identified DH projects/relationships that were preexisting
    • Also concerns about giving the impression that the survey implies immediate action on DH on campus, which would not have been accurate
Environmental Scan of Complex Objects on CampusMelanie/Katie/Jennifer/Adam
  • Thinking about the best way to do this
  • Surveys introduce the following issues:
    • response rate
    • promises/expectation management
    • people feel obligated to answer even if the available responses do not describe their practice
  • Perhaps the environmental scan should be more like interviews or focus groups
  • Interviews would allow us to build relationships
  • How closely related are these two efforts
  • It sounds like these two efforts should be different
  • Adam feels that perhaps one way to go about it is to focus the scan on specific departments
  • Katie suggested that for natural sciences or engineering, the bibliographers might be able to provide a contact
  • Jennifer suggests a phased approach to the scan 
    • Where we take where we learned from the 3 groups and then be able to show some progress for people in the problem
  • The phased approach also manages the scale for the environmental scan and the case studies
  • Natural Sciences preservation - 
    • Is it even an issue for them?
    • Do they know they have a problem?
    • Contacts for Natural Sciences:
      • Dennis Trombatori (sp?) at the Geology Library
      • Cameron in the DAMS group - Associate Dean for Natural Sciences ?
  • Melanie feels that this environmental scan will also be useful for the Digital Curation group at UT Libraries
Figuring out how to break down the environmental scan? 
  • Faculty only?
  • Number of faculty per unit
  • How many people should be in the unit-based teams
  • Roles on a team
    • interviewer (information science) - thinking about involving the iSchool
      • Pat Galloway - translator between archiving and archeology
        • leveraging the Digital Archives class or capstone
        • capstone proposals are due in December
        • students could be involved but we would need to know exactly what we needed them to do
      • Diane Bailey - information professionals at work
    • content specialist (Ex. Adam, Katie, Sydney) to serve as translator
  • Tasks
    • IRB approval if we are going to publish anything or present any results
    • Transcription and coding
    • Interview Questions
  • What do want to outcomes to be
    • summary report
      • identifying patterns - common needs
      • unexpected
      • matching faculty needs to services we already provide on campus/matching competencies
    • workshop
    • grant scoping - coming up with ideas for ideas
    • recommendations for services
    • thinking about this as a research initiative
      • communities of practice
        • what people are doing
        • what we've got
        • were there is overlap
Short description of what we are doing 
  • Complex Digital Objects - give examples and define terms
  • Environmental scan of what CDOs mean in the context of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology
    • identify issues common to all
    • how they are using, managing, and preserving those things
  • One faculty and one staff per unit for the interviews = total of 6 interviews
  • As far as the relationship between the group (with an identity as group) and the campus, we are all here representing our respective institutions - we are not representing ourselves as a group
Round Robin 
  • Jennifer/Melanie
    • Their will be a DCMI overview that is UT Lib specific and then mabye we should open it up to campus
    • Perhaps getting people on campus that attended DCMI to share their notes in a central location
    • Jennifer made some connections with folks to DPLA and she's thinking about crowd-sourced metadata and how to bring that in to the cataloging world
  • Adam
    • His group did a paper on the automated metadata extraction and it is up on the conference website - he is interested in feedback from the library perspective
  • EVENT NOTE:
    • Maria Esteva Archival modeling tomorrow
  • Maryrose
    • The EDMS process is ramping up and the timeline for implementation has accelerated (this spring)
    • The extent to which this is used for other reasons other than admininstrative services is yet unknown
    • Documentum, Al Freso
    • Maryrose is looking at Digital Asset Management components in those systems
    • content management interoperability standards - how to get the systems to talk to each other when long-term preservation is required
    • IMPR wiki
    • Legacy systems being retired from the mainframe
Melanie 
  • To hit all the Round Robins - we might try to alternate one month round robin, one month working group
Adam 
  • He put together an archaeology group that is meeting on October 30th on managing digital objects
  • Adam will float the CDO project to that archaeology group and see who might be interested in participating
  • Ladd will be attending
  • Adam can get a sense of the range of folks doing their thing
  • RTI
    • It was easy to get a large group together to discuss those issues

Action items

  •  Interview questions - two per member of the group
  •  Breaking down the roles in a solid team configuration
  •  Identifying interviewees
  •  Contacting Eunjung - with a description of what we are doing and get an ETA on the IRB process
  •  Contact Dr. Galloway about her class and the PI on the thing
  •  think about scheduling for the spring
  •  making one or two resources pages public
  •  create a section on our wiki for the environmental scan 
  •  checking out the POCO literature and look at if anyone has done anything else
  •  mabye students could work on a lit review