...
\uD83D\uDC65 Participants
\uD83E\uDD45 Goals
...
Discuss SRR takeaways and identify key action items to move forward
Discuss PDR and CDR objectives and timeline
Narrow down the general architectures we are pursuing for the next-gen car
Discuss Daybreak Progress
\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics
Item | Notes |
---|---|
Announcements |
Dynamics:
Aeroshell:
Body:
Emech:
What is something you struggled with this week? What is something you are proud of this week?
SRR Key Takeaways/Next Steps
Overall
Ideas for reviewing drawings and structure for estimating weights
Get reasoning for 3 wheel by PDR
Suspension
Not being scared of aluminum welding and using that as a way to push ourselves
Quantify with just reasoning our parameters like 60-40 or FOS
Steering
Look further into gearbox design as the issues we were maybe afraid of aren’t as big of a thing
Look into tunability
Unsprung
Figure out brake disks
Tolerancing of bearings
Overall
we need to define how we are going to do reference points on the mold, and confirm that the knowledge is transferred
Aerodynamics
We need to solidify the plan for splitting up work and creating different parts of the shell(nose, tail, how to we avoid it messing up the overall geometrey)
Talk about roll cage in an intersystem meeting, because thats the next big thing that defines what we do
Composites
Figure out design of windshield with respect to the polycarb and what materials we should use
LOTS of wesley notes, not worth putting all in this spot since its lot of smaller specific notes
resin infusion is a risk and will cost a lot of money (vacuum)
consider having aeroshell PDR at the same time as dynamics and frame CDR
Be more thoughtful/less arbitrary with goals (i.e. goals were good, but have them bounded better, and be able to directly measure/compare them in the future
Really really review composites plan to ensure we can make good progress while reaching our key frame goals
Be more thoughtful in ergo design, think more about possible situations/applications (minimize oversight)
Difference between making a part that would be cool, and making a part that is practical and effective (i.e. carbon fiber steering wheel vs fiber glass steering wheel)
Rethink whether we really need so much of cooling, vibration dampening, etc
Have a good testing and simulation plan - know the basics.
Do composite testing but only test for your expected loading/impacts. Wastes time
Add FOS to only few parts and then design other parts to handle extreme cases
Shield all HV cables - probably a source of most EMF interference
properly fuse all battery connections
Match mechanical loading of rest of the car in terms of FOS/what we can see during transport
Base cooling off of RMS current
Workday Review
Next Workday Plan
Daybreak Progress
| |
PDR and CDR | Feedback on these dates: PDR: Saturday, January 18, 2025
CDR: Sunday, February 23, 2025 |
Dynamics: | Aeroshell: | Body: | Emech: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
SRR Key Takeaways | ||||
Action Items |
|
|
|
|
Architecture | Dependencies | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|
External Suspension |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Driver placement biased towards front |
|
| |
Driver placement biased towards rear |
|
|
|
Single part top shell | |||
Two part top shell | |||
Multi level frame |
| ||
| |||
Single Battery | Frame - bounding box, potential locations, mounting points Shell - Where can the battery be removed from | ||
Split Battery | Frame - bounding box, potential locations, mounting points Shell - Where can the battery be removed from | ||
Size | Frame - bounding boxes Regs - number of cells | ||
Ducts | Aeroshell - intake/exhaust holes Frame - Routing | Draw external air, better cooling | might not be within regs |
Heat Pipe Cooling | Aeroshell - air intake/exhaust Battery Frame - Space | Higher cooling efficiency than air, uniform cooling, less power allocation, won’t have to worry about positive/negative pressure in battery | regs say we HAVE to have airflow within battery box, need to clarify if heat pipes are an actual substitute. Also this level of cooling might not even be necessary depending on cells |
Airflow Cooling | Aeroshell - air intake/exhaust Battery Frame - Space, duct routing | Previous design, simpler to implement, less testing/calcs needed to design/verify | more fans → more power needed, worse cooling efficiency and nonuniform. Nose intake might not be within regs |
Dynamics: | Aeroshell: | Body: | Emech: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Weekly Updates |
|
| ||
Daybreak Progress |
|
| ||
Questions people want to ask | ||||
What do you need from me this week? |
✅ Action items
- Philip Bortolotti go to dynamics meeting to discuss sensors
- Evan Zhang create preliminary steering linkage support by , getting help from Noah Hickmanfor weldments
- Kayla Lee have new suspension geometry for Daybreak by Sunday
- Pratyush Patra and Frank Li go up to pickle and repair battery
- Parthiv Shah Have battery ready to review by Wednesday or Thursday
- Have composites testing plans done this workday Advait Joshi
- HAVE A DECISION FOR FRONT OR REAR BIASED DRIVER POSITION BY 10/21