2024-10-14 Mechanical Meeting

 Date

Oct 14, 2024

 Participants

  • @Gerard Cardenas

  • @Philip Bortolotti

  • @Harshit Dalmia

  • @Joshua Miksits

  • @Evan Zhang

  • @Aidan Hodgin

  • @Kayla Lee

  • @Parthiv Shah

  • @Kaden Nguyen

  • @Sohan Kureti

  • @Cesar Hernandez

  • @Advait Joshi

 Goals

  • Discuss SRR takeaways and identify key action items to move forward

  • Discuss PDR and CDR objectives and timeline

  • Narrow down the general architectures we are pursuing for the next-gen car

  • Discuss Daybreak Progress

 Discussion topics

Item

Notes

Item

Notes

Announcements

PDR and CDR

Feedback on these dates:

PDR: Saturday, January 18, 2025

  • Aeroshell is planning to have the molds sent out by this time

  • Does not want to change the bottom shell significantly

  • Have something relatively close by PDR

CDR: Sunday, February 23, 2025

 

Dynamics:

Aeroshell:

Body:

Emech:

 

Dynamics:

Aeroshell:

Body:

Emech:

SRR Key Takeaways

https://cloud.wikis.utexas.edu/wiki/x/LwdtD

Aeroshell SRR Takeaways

Body SRR Takeaways

https://cloud.wikis.utexas.edu/wiki/x/i4V4D

Action Items

Setting suspension hardpoints
Determining ride frequency, spring rate
Identify operating conditions
Upright bearing selection
Brake caliper selection
Shock absorber selection
Gather data on steering radii sensitivity
Completion of composite testing plans with timelines and purchasing sheets
Have roll cage meeting with body
Have array size meeting with power gen
Suspension hardpoint widths for Dynamics
Identify driver position
Have roll cage meeting with aeroshell
Create testing plan to determine average and max pedal force
Ergo material decision matrices
Identify nextgen battery box dimensions
Establish plan for cooling calcs and testing/measurements
Set RMS Current value
Cell characterization (Dr Subramanian's lab)
Research automotive grade positivley-latching connectors, duc

Architecture

Dependencies

Pros

Cons

Architecture

Dependencies

Pros

Cons

External Suspension

  • Bottom shell

  • Narrows the front surface area of shell

  • Un-constrains outboard dynamics

  • Accessibility

  • Allows for a larger track width

  • Attaching wheel covers and suspension aero covers

  • Increases turbulence

  • Control arms under higher loads (increased bending moment)

Internal Suspension

 

  • Has been done before

  • No need for wheel covers

  • Minimal turbulence

  • Need for wheel cutouts and access panels

  • Dynamic stability and packaging (especially with 3 wheel car)

Driver placement biased towards front

  • Canopy placement

  • Top shell profile

  • Array placement

  • Roll cage location

  • Battery location

  • Easier to guarantee dynamic stability

  •  

 

Driver placement biased towards rear

  • Canopy placement

  • Top shell profile

  • Array placement

  • Roll cage location

  • Battery location

  • Reduced shading on array

  • Allows for more optimal array cooling

  • Canopy shape matters slightly less

  • Simpler manufacturing for top shell (flat top shell)

  • More difficult to guarantee dynamic stability

Single part top shell

 

 

 

Two part top shell

 

 

 

Multi level frame

 

  • Not shit :)

  • Makes it easier for favorable dynamics

 

Last year’s frame

 

 

 

Single Battery

Frame - bounding box, potential locations, mounting points

Shell - Where can the battery be removed from

 

 

Split Battery

Frame - bounding box, potential locations, mounting points

Shell - Where can the battery be removed from

 

 

Size

Frame - bounding boxes

Regs - number of cells

 

 

Ducts

Aeroshell - intake/exhaust holes

Frame - Routing

Draw external air, better cooling

might not be within regs

Heat Pipe Cooling

Aeroshell - air intake/exhaust

Battery

Frame - Space

Higher cooling efficiency than air, uniform cooling, less power allocation, won’t have to worry about positive/negative pressure in battery

regs say we HAVE to have airflow within battery box, need to clarify if heat pipes are an actual substitute. Also this level of cooling might not even be necessary depending on cells

Airflow Cooling

Aeroshell - air intake/exhaust

Battery

Frame - Space, duct routing

Previous design, simpler to implement, less testing/calcs needed to design/verify

more fans → more power needed, worse cooling efficiency and nonuniform. Nose intake might not be within regs

 

Dynamics:

Aeroshell:

Body:

Emech:

 

Dynamics:

Aeroshell:

Body:

Emech:

Weekly Updates

  • Need to do more daybreak work

 

 

  • Might need to redo/rethink some of the cooling solution due to new regs

  • Adjust module mounting and bus bar location since we are removing load from midpanel

  •  

Daybreak Progress

  • Extending daybreak controls arms by 2

 

 

  • BPS and Contactor layout complete

  • Main enclosure complete, need to add mounting locks and roller wheel

  • Dashboard layout and connections finalized - controls has v1 done, waiting for review and order

  • Opened up battery and identified broken modules. Prat and Frank will have ppl go up and start fixing it to start motor testing.

  • Driver cooling (on dashboard) design finished

Questions people want to ask

 

 

 

 

What do you need from me this week?

 

 

 

 

 Action items

@Philip Bortolotti go to dynamics meeting to discuss sensors
@Evan Zhang create preliminary steering linkage support by Oct 20, 2024 , getting help from @Noah Hickmanfor weldments
@Kayla Lee have new suspension geometry for Daybreak by Sunday
@Pratyush Patra and @Frank Li go up to pickle and repair battery
@Parthiv Shah Have battery ready to review by Wednesday or Thursday
Have composites testing plans done this workday @Advait Joshi
HAVE A DECISION FOR FRONT OR REAR BIASED DRIVER POSITION BY 10/21

 Decisions

Related pages