2024-10-14 Mechanical Meeting
Date
Oct 14, 2024
Participants
@Gerard Cardenas
@Philip Bortolotti
@Harshit Dalmia
@Joshua Miksits
@Evan Zhang
@Aidan Hodgin
@Kayla Lee
@Parthiv Shah
@Kaden Nguyen
@Sohan Kureti
@Cesar Hernandez
@Advait Joshi
Goals
Discuss SRR takeaways and identify key action items to move forward
Discuss PDR and CDR objectives and timeline
Narrow down the general architectures we are pursuing for the next-gen car
Discuss Daybreak Progress
Discussion topics
Item | Notes |
---|---|
Announcements |
|
PDR and CDR | Feedback on these dates: PDR: Saturday, January 18, 2025
CDR: Sunday, February 23, 2025 |
| Dynamics: | Aeroshell: | Body: | Emech: |
---|---|---|---|---|
SRR Key Takeaways | ||||
Action Items | Setting suspension hardpoints Determining ride frequency, spring rate Identify operating conditions Upright bearing selection Brake caliper selection Shock absorber selection Gather data on steering radii sensitivity | Completion of composite testing plans with timelines and purchasing sheets Have roll cage meeting with body Have array size meeting with power gen | Suspension hardpoint widths for Dynamics Identify driver position Have roll cage meeting with aeroshell Create testing plan to determine average and max pedal force Ergo material decision matrices | Identify nextgen battery box dimensions Establish plan for cooling calcs and testing/measurements Set RMS Current value Cell characterization (Dr Subramanian's lab) Research automotive grade positivley-latching connectors, duc |
Architecture | Dependencies | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|
External Suspension |
|
|
|
Internal Suspension |
|
|
|
Driver placement biased towards front |
|
|
|
Driver placement biased towards rear |
|
|
|
Single part top shell |
|
|
|
Two part top shell |
|
|
|
Multi level frame |
|
|
|
Last year’s frame |
|
|
|
Single Battery | Frame - bounding box, potential locations, mounting points Shell - Where can the battery be removed from |
|
|
Split Battery | Frame - bounding box, potential locations, mounting points Shell - Where can the battery be removed from |
|
|
Size | Frame - bounding boxes Regs - number of cells |
|
|
Ducts | Aeroshell - intake/exhaust holes Frame - Routing | Draw external air, better cooling | might not be within regs |
Heat Pipe Cooling | Aeroshell - air intake/exhaust Battery Frame - Space | Higher cooling efficiency than air, uniform cooling, less power allocation, won’t have to worry about positive/negative pressure in battery | regs say we HAVE to have airflow within battery box, need to clarify if heat pipes are an actual substitute. Also this level of cooling might not even be necessary depending on cells |
Airflow Cooling | Aeroshell - air intake/exhaust Battery Frame - Space, duct routing | Previous design, simpler to implement, less testing/calcs needed to design/verify | more fans → more power needed, worse cooling efficiency and nonuniform. Nose intake might not be within regs |
| Dynamics: | Aeroshell: | Body: | Emech: |
---|---|---|---|---|
Weekly Updates |
|
|
|
|
Daybreak Progress |
|
|
|
|
Questions people want to ask |
|
|
|
|
What do you need from me this week? |
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the University Wiki Service! Please use your IID (yourEID@eid.utexas.edu) when prompted for your email address during login or click here to enter your EID. If you are experiencing any issues loading content on pages, please try these steps to clear your browser cache.