Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

Announcements

Michael

  • People attend open-garage on wednesday

  • Don’t be afraid to use division meetings and system meetings as time to work. Workdays need not and ought not be the only times people are collaborating.

    • This early on, most work is truly collaborative

    • Parallelization happens later on in design process

Budget

Michael

  • Michael and Philip met with other Chief E’s and Captains to discuss budget strategy and come to consensus

  • Reminder: All the budget really decides is the

  • Key takeaways:

    • Competition costs would not be included in budget

    • We should not be making up bullshit “in case something goes wrong” or buying a hundred extras of stuff

    • The budget is for setting the ratio of CR income to each team, so if we get more combustion gets less etc.

  • Who will be coming to the budget meeting to advise (in-person or on discord)?

    • Pratyush

  • I need justifications to address

    • Why do we need this

    • Why is this needed over cheaper options

    • Why is this needed this year

    • Why is this amount needed

15 mins

Recruiting

Philip

  • Do not take recruiting lightly

    • Some of the people applying may have had LHR as a reason why they attended UT Austin in the first place. This process means a lot to some people

    • How we act in this process reflects on LHR as an org and Solar as a team

  • Applications

    • System leads: start looking at applications soon. If you leave it for last minute it will be a huge workload

    • Prioritize time-commitment skills, effort in short-answer responses over technical experience. Don’t disregard technical experience however

  • Interviews

    • Philip is willing to interview for any system if you need a slot filled

    • Two people interviewing at a time. Try to have both a boy and a girl whenever possible. Especially when interviewing girls, try to have a girl present.

    • Would appreciate if former system leads could participate in interviews to take load off the new leads

    • Questions should gauge

      • Dedication to things they care about

      • Curiosity about the solar car in particular

      • If they are a team player

      • Excitement to be in LHR

      • Willingness to try to solve problems they don’t know how to

Requirements

Philip

  • Want list of requirements per system to be filled out by workday

    • Meaning what requirements do we need to figure out

  • In three weeks, want requirements to be completely filled out

    • Meaning quantitatively if possible, with well-reasoned and deliberate calculations/simulations/justifications

  • Requirements should be SMART goals

    • S - Specific

      • No - Unsprung components are strong enough to survive the forces the are under

      • Yes - Unsprung components must have minimum FOS > 1.2

    • M - Measurable

      • No - Have a very aerodynamic vehicle

      • Yes - Have a coefficient of drag < 0.255

    • A - Acheivable

      • No - Have a vehicle weight of 2 lbs

      • Yes - Have a vehicle weight of 500 lbs

    • R - Relevant

      • No - give members greater design autonomy: not part of the purpose of this document

      • The unsprung system will weigh <50 lbs

    • T - Time-based

      • Not as important for this exercise

      • I suppose we can include deadlines once we set them if we want

  • This is a living document, and it may be subject to change later further on in design, but ideally it stays as close as possible to how it is when we “finish” it

    • The better we define our requirements now, the fewer changes we have to make later, and the easier design is

  • Division meetings, discuss further division level requirements

    • May be more qualitative, and define requirements for processes

Past Workday Review

Systems

  • Electrical

    • Yapped about new system architecture

    • PeripheralSOM schematic is ready for review and currently working on layout (Lakshay)

  • Controls

  • BPS

    • Members working on new projects

      • New Amperes board revision starting (Nathan)

      • Writting a CAN test for our new chip (Kadhir)

      • Driver for our new Temperature chip (Aniruddh)

  • Power Gen

  • Power Sys

  • Data Acq

  • Mechanical

  • Dynamics

  • Aeroshell

  • Body

    • Members research/experimented with CAD

      • Frame members got exposure to weldments

      • Ergo members continued researching projects/developments for Pedal Box, Seat, Steering Wheel, etc. etc.

  • Emech

Next Workday Plan

Systems

  • Electrical

    • Done with PeripheralSOM ™️ (Lakshay)

  • Controls

  • BPS

    • Continue to work on projects from last week

    • Presenting rationale for next-gen BPS design decisions (like split battery box).

  • Power Gen

  • Power Sys

  • Data Acq

  • Mechanical

  • Dynamics

  • Aeroshell

  • Body

    • Continue research (ergo) and start any final research on composites (frame)

    • Nail down hybrid vs tubular frame (hinges on budget atp)

    • Move from using weldments in CAD to using FEA?

    • Continue to ball tf out like always 😤

  • Emech

✅ Action items

  • Have list of requirement parameters set by workday - All leads
  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels