The intial CAD for this project was borrowed from
Figure 1: Initial CAD Borrowed from Research Paper and Altered
Figure 2: Prototype No. 1 - Failed due to lack of link thickness tolerancing
This design looked impressive, but it had several problems. First, it had a limited range of motion. As the mechanism is mirrored on both sides for stability, there needs to be a long bolt that crosses through joint __ . This ended up interfering with the motion of the finger by blocking the four-bar from extending further once it hit the bolt. This resulted in a limited range of motion and a high flexion distance from the finger to the palm, which would mean we could only really hold large objects. Another problem we faced was the difficulty of assembly, which took at least an hour and a half because of all the small bolts and the lack of tolerancing on the 3D-printed holes. Finally, the hole sizes were not uniform which led to there being a bit of play.
Figure 3: Prototype No. 2 - Failed due to lack of ROM of end-effector
Figure 4: Initial Design 2, simplified linkages
Figure 5: Prototype No. 3 - Updated prototype with simpler linkage design, higher ROM
This prototype had several benefits over the previous one. First, it was better toleranced and assembled more easily since we standardized all the bolt sizes to M3. Secondly, it had a greater range of motion due to the lack of a bolt going across the middle connecting Link 2 to Link 4, which was previously hitting the mechanism and stopping it. Finally, it was overall simpler to manufacture and assembly. Going forward, this is the basic design we will be using for our
| Arduino Nano |
Table 2: Projected Bill of Materials for Final Project