| | | | Recruitment | - Marianna - CSU training, an audience to tap into
- Adam - there was a call in COLA to come up with research groups and they put up an archaeology research cluster focused on digital archieology and complex digital objects, COLA's effort to revitalize TARL - those people would be the network of people, research cluster are people that could go in on grants together; one off round table with food - a faculty panel, Spring (break it out into the appropriate domains)
- this would need to be targeted with key individuals that you knew could do it
- clear thematic connections between the members in a mixed-domain group
- most faculty have an issue with data preservation but it's not urgent
- data management plan should be part of the invitation so people see an end goal or benefit to participate
- training needs to be framed in terms of solving a probleme rather than creating more work
- Ashley is interested in this because Dr. Haricombe is interested in being embedded in the research, not just seen as a service that faculty needs to find. They can see that value.
- Marianna - it is unclear whether the faculty research data is a state record - it depends on the contract with the funding agency
- the retention period for data is 3-5 years after the project is over
- if faculty don't want to get rid of that data afterwards to do a longitudinal study, that is an option but you have to have clear justification
- could this be useful for developing records management training for faculty or a webinar
- there is a big question about which is which
- Ashley
- where does records management leave off and the data management librarian picks up
- TACC 5,000 for faculty
- Space on production server
- Maintenance of data set
- Someone who works with data structures and metadata
- Commitment for maintenance for dynamic data sets
- The relationships between existing department and new positions that are only recently coming online
|