Corner Balancing - Combustion

10/11 12am corner balancing for drive night before UTA trip

Goals:

  • getting suspension level and accurate to CAD

  • Front and Rear axles should have similar weight distribution across the wheels of one axle

  • Rear wheels should have slightly greater values

  • Rear CG bias to induce oversteer - more important to FSAE

  • ride height - no regulations just avoid scraping - dependent on aero platform and the values they want to ensure X downforce

  • toe out

  • Rear - ~175 lbs each wheel

  • Front - ~155lbs each wheel

Process:

  • if FR and RL were the two values most similar and too low- reduce warping moment by either jacking both up or lower the FL and RR

  • set up frame and scales on frame - level the frame by adjusting lengths of the corner supports (the ETC garage floor is slanted) - they used some wood panels to elevate rear wheels

  • measured ride height - laying extruded T-bar across an axle’s set of scales to have reference flat, use measuring tape to the bottom of body

  • measured toe - flat stock on both wheels across axle, then two tape measurers on either side of stock to see the difference

  • jacking and adjusting weight to each wheel by

    • adjusting PULLRODS - adjusted in turns

    • adjusting shocks spring perch

  • ride height and preload affected

  • certain threshold of perch adjustment that does not affect preload

  • Pullrod adjust

    • lengthen - wheel up, < weight

    • shorten - wheel down, > weight

  • Spring perch adjust

    • lower perch longer spring - pullrod down, wheel down, > weight

    • raise perch shorter spring - pullrod up, wheel up, < weight

  • cycling suspension - pushing on the frame after adjustments to let the suspension relax and make sure it is not caught anywhere

  • plastic on scales - get rid of tire grip so that suspension “relaxes” for same reasons as cycling

  • torque marking - fasteners

 

 

Related pages