VII Conclusion and Future Work
Design with two Jansen legs coupled with the attachment of stepper motors that drives the motion worked as intended. The resulting motion is similar to our analysis for a forward motion, and the simplicity of using dowels instead of screws helped with less friction in the joints. This idea was a great decision because the motion was better than using the screws.
However, we conclude that our design is not robust for fast motions, and the areas for improvement are:
- Further improving the joint stiffness
- Using higher-powered stepper motors
- Increasing the number of legs
Welcome to the University Wiki Service! Please use your IID (yourEID@eid.utexas.edu) when prompted for your email address during login or click here to enter your EID. If you are experiencing any issues loading content on pages, please try these steps to clear your browser cache.