Decision Matrix: 3 vs. 4 Wheel Car Design
Status | Not started |
Owner | |
---|---|
Contributors | |
Approved | |
Due date | Sep 28, 2024 |
Decision |
|
On this page |
Problem statement
Research insights
Solution hypothesis
Design options
Preliminary Notes:
Frame
Pros:
3 wheel lends itself to a more "bullet" type design, could prove to be more aerodynamic
Could potentially lead to a smaller car footprint because of 3 wheels, meaning we could save weight on aeroshell, frame, etc.
Innovative design, not sticking to what we have done previously
Explore trailing arm suspension
Cons:
More prone to body roll because of only one wheel contacting on the back AND potentially biased COG/COM
3 wheel design means that we would need to support the entire weight of the car but now with one less wheel, could prove to create more complex/heavy dynamics assemblies
Overall, the car would be less stable (aka we would probably need more driving practice)
Frame would be asymmetrical and mounting of the rear wheel would be an interesting dilemma (not saying its not possible, but it would either be trailing the frame in a weird way, or be inside the frame and be hard to work on)
Hard balance between low drag and low stability (aka your trackwidth and wheelbase would absolutely have to be optimized to actually utilize the benefits of a 3-wheeled frame)
| Option 1 | Option 2 | |
---|---|---|---|
Overview |
| ||
Screenshot |
| ||
Link |
| ||
Benefits and risks |
| ||
Criteria | |||
|
|
|
Follow up
Decision | Status | Next steps |
---|---|---|
decided / in review / other | ||
|
|
|
Source files
Type /link to add links to design files.
Welcome to the University Wiki Service! Please use your IID (yourEID@eid.utexas.edu) when prompted for your email address during login or click here to enter your EID. If you are experiencing any issues loading content on pages, please try these steps to clear your browser cache.