Decision Matrix: 3 vs. 4 Wheel Car Design

Status

Not started

Owner

Contributors

Approved

Due date

Sep 28, 2024

Decision

 

On this page

 

 Problem statement


 

 Research insights


 Solution hypothesis


 

 

 Design options

Preliminary Notes:

Frame

Pros:

  • 3 wheel lends itself to a more "bullet" type design, could prove to be more aerodynamic

  • Could potentially lead to a smaller car footprint because of 3 wheels, meaning we could save weight on aeroshell, frame, etc.

  • Innovative design, not sticking to what we have done previously

  • Explore trailing arm suspension

Cons:

  • More prone to body roll because of only one wheel contacting on the back AND potentially biased COG/COM

  • 3 wheel design means that we would need to support the entire weight of the car but now with one less wheel, could prove to create more complex/heavy dynamics assemblies

  • Overall, the car would be less stable (aka we would probably need more driving practice)

  • Frame would be asymmetrical and mounting of the rear wheel would be an interesting dilemma (not saying its not possible, but it would either be trailing the frame in a weird way, or be inside the frame and be hard to work on)

  • Hard balance between low drag and low stability (aka your trackwidth and wheelbase would absolutely have to be optimized to actually utilize the benefits of a 3-wheeled frame)

 

Option 1

Option 2

 

Option 1

Option 2

Overview

 

Screenshot

 

Link

 

Benefits and risks

 

Criteria

 

 

 

 Follow up

Decision

Status

Next steps

Decision

Status

Next steps

decided / in review / other

 

 

 

 

 Source files

Type /link to add links to design files.

 

Related pages