PM - Manufacturing and Assembly

This section focuses on our manufacturing process and its refinement. It begins with a critique of our preliminary method and then transitions to our final process. Lastly, we conclude with our lessons learned.


Preliminary Method

Our initial method involved laser cutting (Fig 7.) Acetal Delrin sheets (12"x12"x1/4") for our long, planar links. We reserved 3D printing for parts with intricate geometries. Those of which, could not be readily fabricated by the means we had at our disposal. These parts included the modified spur and bevel gears, and the mount for our gripper. See Figure 2 below.

Upon inspection of our laser cut links, we discovered visible heat damage and material expansion. See the Figure 1. (Below)


  1. These Photos show the lack of precision and visual aesthetic that was achieved when using laser cutting.

Furthermore, the laser cut holes in our Delrin were slightly angled and lacked concentricity. This complicated the press fits on our rods and bearings while adding additional alignment issues. We did expect this complication; however our method for expanding those holes with a drill press did not yield desired results. The accumulated error from this process prevented assembly of our first prototype. 

2. Initial 3D Gear Designs/Prints (top) 3D-Printed Gripper mount (bottom)

After this prototyping mishap, and considering time constraints, we decided that instead of making a "final prototype" , that we would make a "working prototype" and this proved to be the most beneficial approach. Though we changed our approach, we still needed a means for appropriately cutting our stock material. 

Final Method

Upon reevaluation and much consideration, we concluded that CNC milling would be the best method to machine our parts. Not only is the CNC mill more accurate and precise than the laser cutter, but it also did not leave burn marks or expand our material. Moreover, the precision offered by the CNC mill enabled us to design for interference fits which allowed us to press fit our rods and bearings securely into each specified link. See Figure 5. And although we changed our cutting scheme for the links, we decided that the gears that we had made in the preliminary stages would suffice in terms of strength and ductility. The only modification  that we made was adding more teeth and changing the geometry of our spur gears to provide for a smoother motion. We also chose to make our actuation components that would be coupled with the motor out of the same material, which proved to work quite well.


3.  3D Print Setup - All our gears as well as our parts for actuation were printed in PLA at the highest possible quality 

After we knew that we had all of our links and gears appropriately designed and manufactured, it was now time to start looking into assembly and testing.


4. Special Care had to be taken when manufacturing the Pins as we did not want them to interfere with other links in the assembly. With this in mind we used a drop saw to make the initial cut and then used the manual lathe to remove material and ultimately achieve our precise required lengths.

For our motor mount, we knew that there would be a considerable amount of torque imparted on the motor. Therefore it needed to be sturdy and able to withstand such torque. Extruded aluminum from 80/20 corp. allowed us to achieve this goal. Furthermore, we gained full adjust-ability in terms of placement of the motor.

5. Motor Mount using Extruded Aluminum from 80/20 inc.

One of the final aspects of manufacturing and assembly that we had to consider was mounting our links to the aluminum frame and mounting our gripper to the links. This was accomplished by machining 1"x1" Delrin blocks that would allow for interference/press fits of the rotary shafts as well as making counterbored holes for actual mounting and mitigating the possibility of interference between the mounting screws and the links.

6. Manufacturing of the mounting blocks using the manual mill (left), the mounting blocks in their final configuration within the assembly (middle), and the gripper mounted to the mounting block itself (right)

After all of these manufacturing tasks were complete, we were finally able to fully assemble our mechanism. To our delight (and great relief), we were able to assemble our mechanism without any issues, thanks to all of the prototyping and lessons we learned along the way.

We would like to thank and acknowledge our classmate, Michael Bettatti for lending us his expertise and advice in CNC milling, holding extra machine shop hours, and just answering general machining questions we had. By doing so, he facilitated our manufacturing process.

Lessons Learned

There were a variety of challenges we encountered during the manufacturing process. The most frustrating was receiving bent stock Delrin sheets. We quickly learned that the quality of our full assembly would be greatly constrained by the quality of our stock parts; and unfortunately, the effect of the bend carried through the entire design. Had we known that we were going to set out to CNC our parts initially, we would have opted for aluminum sheets instead. Additionally, the 3D printed gears proved to be weak at times and susceptible to chipping and bends. Furthermore, the printed part tolerances were variable between printers and between print jobs. We could have possibly eliminated the need for 3D printed parts had we designed our assembly around standard gear sizes. Those of which, could have been purchased from companies such as Mcmaster Carr and modified later.  



7. Preliminary Method: Laser Cutting



8. Final Method: CNC Milling